GetResponse vs Constant Contact
Compare GetResponse and Constant Contact drip email features, automation builders, pricing, and deliverability for automated email sequences.
Last updated: 2026-03-15
GetResponse
www.getresponse.comAll-in-one marketing platform with powerful autoresponders
Best for: Mid-size businesses needing advanced automation, webinars, and drip sequences
Constant Contact
www.constantcontact.comTrusted email marketing for small businesses and nonprofits
Best for: Small businesses, nonprofits, and event organizers who value support and simplicity
TL;DR: GetResponse vs Constant Contact for Drip Campaigns
GetResponse is the stronger platform for drip email campaigns, offering a more capable automation builder and better workflow flexibility. Constant Contact is easier to use but significantly limited in drip sequence capabilities. For businesses that rely heavily on automated email sequences, GetResponse is the better choice.
Best for marketers who need powerful drip automation with advanced triggers.
Best for small businesses who prioritize simplicity and personal support.
Best for SaaS companies needing billing-aware drip sequences.
Editor's Note
These two platforms serve very different audiences. GetResponse is for marketers who want serious drip automation. Constant Contact is for small businesses that want "good enough" email marketing with great support. SaaS companies should consider Sequenzy for billing-native drip sequences.
GetResponse vs Constant Contact vs Sequenzy: Quick Comparison
| Feature | GetResponse | Constant Contact | Sequenzy | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Automation Builder | Advanced flowchart builder | Basic path-based automation | SaaS-focused workflow builder | GetResponse |
| Time-Based Delays | Minutes, hours, days, specific date | Days only | Minutes, hours, days, custom | GetResponse |
| Behavioral Triggers | 15+ trigger types | 5 basic trigger types | 12+ triggers including billing events | GetResponse |
| A/B Testing in Drips | Subject, content, send time | Subject line A/B only | Subject, content, send time | GetResponse |
| Event Management | No native event tools | Built-in event invitations and RSVP | Not included | Constant Contact |
| Ease of Setup | Moderate learning curve | Very beginner-friendly | Quick setup with pre-built sequences | Constant Contact |
| Social Media Tools | Basic social posting | Social media scheduling included | Not included (email-focused) | Constant Contact |
| Drip Personalization | Dynamic content blocks | Basic merge fields | Subscription-aware personalization | GetResponse |
Score Breakdown
Totals: GetResponse 61/80, Constant Contact 53/80, Sequenzy 64/80.
Drip Email Feature Comparison
Feature-by-feature analysis of drip campaign capabilities.
Sequence Building
| Feature | GetResponse | Constant Contact | Sequenzy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visual workflow editor | 9/10 Full flowchart builder with complex routing | 5/10 Simple path-based automation with limited steps | 8/10 Streamlined builder with SaaS templates |
| Conditional branching | 8/10 If/else, scoring, tag-based branches | 4/10 Yes/no conditions based on opens and clicks | 8/10 Billing status, trial stage conditions |
| Goal tracking | 8/10 Goal-based completion exits | 3/10 No goal tracking in automations | 9/10 Conversion goals linked to subscriptions |
| Multi-step sequences | 9/10 Unlimited steps with branching logic | 5/10 Limited to simple series (5-10 steps typical) | 8/10 Pre-built multi-step SaaS sequences |
Timing & Delivery
| Feature | GetResponse | Constant Contact | Sequenzy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Send time optimization | 8/10 Perfect Timing AI | 5/10 No AI send time optimization | 7/10 Timezone-aware delivery |
| Delay options | 9/10 Minute-level precision with date/time targeting | 5/10 Day-level delays only | 8/10 Flexible delays including minute-level |
| Throttling | 7/10 Batch sending controls | 5/10 Basic send pacing | 7/10 Built-in rate management |
Personalization
| Feature | GetResponse | Constant Contact | Sequenzy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynamic content | 8/10 Content blocks per segment | 4/10 Very basic conditional content | 8/10 Plan-aware dynamic content |
| Merge tags | 8/10 Custom fields, calculated values | 6/10 Standard merge fields | 8/10 Subscription data fields |
| Segmentation in drips | 8/10 Segment-based branching mid-sequence | 4/10 Limited to entry-level filtering | 9/10 Real-time segment updates during drip |
Pricing Comparison
Constant Contact starts cheaper but offers far less automation capability. GetResponse provides substantially more drip features per dollar. Sequenzy offers flat-rate SaaS-focused pricing.
Up to 500 contacts, limited autoresponders, 2,500 newsletters/mo
No free plan. 60-day free trial.
No free plan. Starts at $19/mo for 15,000 emails.
| Tier | GetResponse | Constant Contact | Sequenzy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 contacts | Free (limited) Limited automations | $12/mo Lite plan, basic automation | $19/mo 15K emails, full automation |
| 2,500 contacts | $29/mo Full automation builder | $35/mo Standard plan with basic automation | $19/mo Same flat rate |
| 10,000 contacts | $79/mo Includes webinars and funnels | $80/mo Standard plan, limited automations | $19/mo 15K cap, add-ons available |
| 25,000 contacts | $174/mo All premium features | $210/mo Premium plan, more automation steps | $19/mo May need volume upgrade |
Pricing Verdict: GetResponse is the better value at every tier for drip campaign capabilities. Constant Contact charges more at scale while offering less automation power. Sequenzy is the clear winner for SaaS teams with moderate volumes.
Cost Note
Constant Contact gets expensive quickly at larger list sizes while offering limited automation. GetResponse provides far more drip campaign value for similar pricing. Sequenzy flat $19/mo for 15K emails is the most predictable cost for SaaS teams.
Drip Campaign Types Comparison
How each platform handles different types of drip email campaigns.
Welcome Series
Onboarding new subscribers with a series of emails
GetResponse
Pre-built welcome templates with branching based on engagement
Constant Contact
Simple 3-email welcome series template
Sequenzy
SaaS onboarding with trial milestone triggers
Verdict: GetResponse and Sequenzy both outperform Constant Contact for welcome sequences.
Lead Nurture
Multi-touch sequences guiding leads toward conversion
GetResponse
Scoring-based drips with funnel integration
Constant Contact
Basic follow-up emails based on opens/clicks
Sequenzy
Trial-to-paid nurture with billing awareness
Verdict: Constant Contact lacks the depth needed for lead nurturing drips.
Event Follow-Up
Post-event drip sequences for attendees
GetResponse
Automation triggered by webinar attendance
Constant Contact
Native event management with attendee follow-up
Sequenzy
Not specifically designed for events
Verdict: Constant Contact wins for event-related drip campaigns with its built-in event tools.
Re-engagement
Win-back campaigns for inactive subscribers
GetResponse
Engagement scoring triggers re-engagement workflows
Constant Contact
Basic inactive subscriber targeting
Sequenzy
Churn risk detection from billing data
Verdict: GetResponse and Sequenzy handle re-engagement far better than Constant Contact.
Post-Purchase
Follow-up after a sale or subscription start
GetResponse
E-commerce triggers via Shopify/WooCommerce
Constant Contact
Basic purchase follow-up via Shopify
Sequenzy
Native Stripe/Paddle post-purchase automation
Verdict: Sequenzy dominates SaaS post-purchase drips. GetResponse is better for e-commerce.
The Bigger Picture
Constant Contact only real advantage in drip campaign types is event follow-up, where its native event tools shine. For every other drip campaign type, GetResponse is the stronger choice. SaaS billing-aware drips remain a Sequenzy exclusive.
Automation Builder Comparison
| Feature | GetResponse | Constant Contact | Sequenzy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drag-and-drop editor | Yes Full visual flowchart | Yes Simple path-based editor | Yes Streamlined drip builder |
| If/else branching | Yes Multiple condition types | Yes Open/click conditions only | Yes Billing-aware conditions |
| Webhook triggers | Yes On Marketing Automation plan | No No webhook support | Yes Webhook and API triggers |
| Lead scoring | Yes Built-in with automation triggers | No No lead scoring | No Uses subscription status instead |
| Multi-channel automation | Yes Email, SMS, web push | Yes Email and SMS (Premium plan) | No Email-only automation |
| Pre-built templates | Yes 20+ automation templates | Yes 8 basic templates | Yes SaaS pre-built sequences |
| Automation duplication | Yes Clone and modify | Yes Copy automations | Yes One-click cloning |
Email Templates & Editor
| Aspect | GetResponse | Constant Contact | Sequenzy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Editor Type | Drag-and-drop with HTML option | Drag-and-drop with AI content assistant | Drag-and-drop with plain text |
| Template Library | 150+ templates | 200+ templates | SaaS-focused templates |
| Mobile Preview | Built-in responsive preview | Mobile-optimized previews | Responsive preview |
| Custom HTML | Full HTML editor | Limited HTML editing | HTML customization |
| Brand Kit | Colors, fonts, logos | Brand template with logo and colors | Basic branding |
Deliverability Comparison
| Factor | GetResponse | Constant Contact | Sequenzy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Inbox Rate | 88-92% | 83-88% | 91-95% |
| SPF/DKIM Setup | Guided verification process | Basic setup documentation | Automated DNS verification |
| Dedicated IP | Available on Max plan | Not available on standard plans | Shared IPs optimized for SaaS |
| Bounce Handling | Automatic removal | Automatic bounce management | Automatic processing |
| Spam Testing | Built-in spam checker | No built-in spam testing | Pre-send deliverability check |
GetResponse consistently outperforms Constant Contact in deliverability benchmarks. Constant Contact has a large user base, which can sometimes lead to shared IP reputation issues. Sequenzy maintains clean IP pools by focusing on SaaS senders.
Integration Ecosystem
GetResponse: ~170 integrations. Constant Contact: ~300. Sequenzy: ~25.
Payment/Billing
| Service | GetResponse | Constant Contact | Sequenzy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stripe | Yes (Via Zapier) | Yes (Via Zapier) | Yes (Native, deep integration) |
| PayPal | Yes (Native) | No (Not available) | No (Not available) |
| Paddle | No (Not available) | No (Not available) | Yes (Native, deep integration) |
CRM
| Service | GetResponse | Constant Contact | Sequenzy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce | Yes (Native integration) | Yes (Native integration) | No (Not available) |
| HubSpot | Yes (Via Zapier) | Yes (Via Zapier) | Yes (Via API) |
E-commerce
| Service | GetResponse | Constant Contact | Sequenzy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shopify | Yes (Native) | Yes (Native integration) | No (Not e-commerce focused) |
| WooCommerce | Yes (Native) | Yes (Native integration) | No (Not e-commerce focused) |
Analytics & Reporting
| Metric | GetResponse | Constant Contact | Sequenzy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Rate Tracking | Real-time with trend graphs | Basic open rate reports | Real-time open tracking |
| Click Tracking | Click maps and link-level data | Basic click reporting | Click tracking with attribution |
| Drip Step Analytics | Per-step performance with drop-off | Per-email stats only | Funnel analytics per step |
| Revenue Attribution | E-commerce revenue tracking | Limited sales reporting | Native MRR tracking |
| A/B Test Reporting | Statistical significance | Basic winner display | Conversion-focused results |
GetResponse: Unique
- + Webinar analytics
- + Conversion funnel reporting
- + Engagement scoring trends
Constant Contact: Unique
- + Social media post analytics
- + Event RSVP tracking
- + Contact growth trends
Sequenzy: Unique
- + MRR impact per sequence
- + Trial conversion rates
- + Churn prevention metrics
Pros & Cons
GetResponse
Pros
- + Significantly more powerful automation builder
- + Built-in webinars and conversion funnels
- + Lead scoring for intelligent drip targeting
- + AI send time optimization
- + Better deliverability track record
Cons
- - No native event management tools
- - Higher learning curve than Constant Contact
- - Free plan is more limited
- - No social media scheduling built in
Constant Contact
Pros
- + Extremely beginner-friendly interface
- + Built-in event management with RSVP
- + Social media scheduling included
- + Large integration marketplace (300+)
- + Strong phone and chat support
Cons
- - Automation builder is very basic for drip campaigns
- - No lead scoring or advanced segmentation
- - Limited behavioral triggers
- - Deliverability rates trail competitors
- - Gets expensive at scale with limited automation value
Best For: Who Should Use What?
SaaS Trial Onboarding
Automated drip for free trial conversion
Sequenzy natively integrates with Stripe/Paddle for billing-aware trial drip sequences.
Nonprofit Fundraising
Donor engagement drip campaign
Constant Contact offers nonprofit discounts, event tools, and a simple interface ideal for nonprofit teams.
Marketing Funnel
Complex lead nurture with scoring
GetResponse combines lead scoring, conversion funnels, and advanced automation for complete funnel management.
Event Follow-Up
Post-event attendee nurturing
Constant Contact built-in event management integrates directly with email follow-up sequences.
SaaS Churn Prevention
Automated win-back for at-risk subscribers
Sequenzy detects churn risk from billing data and triggers preventive drip sequences automatically.
Migration Guide
GetResponse to Constant Contact
- 1. Export contacts from GetResponse as CSV
- 2. Import contacts into Constant Contact
- 3. Recreate simple drip sequences in Constant Contact
- 4. Rebuild email templates using Constant Contact editor
- 5. Test sequences before going live
- 6. Update forms and integrations
Watch Out
- ! Complex automations with branching will need major simplification
- ! Lead scores and webinar data cannot be migrated
- ! Funnel data will be lost
Constant Contact to GetResponse
- 1. Export contacts from Constant Contact
- 2. Import into GetResponse with field mapping
- 3. Recreate drip sequences with enhanced logic
- 4. Set up templates in GetResponse editor
- 5. Authenticate domain in GetResponse
- 6. Test all automations
Watch Out
- ! Event management data will not transfer
- ! Social media connections need reconfiguration
The Bottom Line
Choose GetResponse if...
- ✓ Drip campaign automation is a core requirement
- ✓ You need lead scoring and advanced branching logic
- ✓ Webinars and conversion funnels are part of your strategy
- ✓ You want AI-optimized send times
Choose Constant Contact if...
- ✓ You need event management integrated with email
- ✓ Simplicity and ease of use are your top priorities
- ✓ Phone support is important to your team
- ✓ You only need basic autoresponder sequences
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GetResponse better than Constant Contact for drip campaigns?
Yes, GetResponse is substantially better for drip email campaigns. It offers more triggers, branching logic, goal tracking, and A/B testing within automation workflows. Constant Contact automation is limited to basic series.
Does Constant Contact have a free plan?
No. Constant Contact offers a 60-day free trial but no permanent free plan. GetResponse offers a free plan for up to 500 contacts, and Sequenzy starts at $19/mo.
Which is easier to use?
Constant Contact is widely considered the easiest email marketing platform. Its interface is designed for beginners with minimal technical skills. However, this simplicity limits drip campaign capabilities.
Can I run complex automation in Constant Contact?
Constant Contact automation is limited to basic triggered series. For complex drip campaigns with branching, scoring, or multiple conditions, GetResponse or Sequenzy are better choices.
Which has better customer support?
Constant Contact is known for excellent phone and chat support. GetResponse offers 24/7 live chat and email support. Both are responsive, but Constant Contact phone support is a differentiator.